Battery Test - Revision history

Denis: Undo revision 438 by Ovipowumon (talk)

2010-11-24T22:17:30Z

Undo revision 438 by Ovipowumon (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 24 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~----~~
	<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
	~~----~~
	~~=[http://axuzexy.co.cc UNDER COSTRUCTION, PLEASE SEE THIS POST IN RESERVE COPY]=~~
	~~----~~
	~~=[http://axuzexy.co.cc CLICK HERE]=~~
	~~----~~
	~~</div>~~
	Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:		Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:

Ovipowumon at 03:36, 24 November 2010

2010-11-24T03:36:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:36, 24 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
			----
			<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
			----
			=[http://axuzexy.co.cc UNDER COSTRUCTION, PLEASE SEE THIS POST IN RESERVE COPY]=
			----
			=[http://axuzexy.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
			----
			</div>
	Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:		Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:

Denis: /* Second Trial */

2008-03-14T06:00:31Z

Second Trial

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:00, 14 March 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	* Energizer Lithium, installed Feb 29, 2008, '''estimated''' battery death: Aug 16, 2008.		* Energizer Lithium, installed Feb 29, 2008, '''estimated''' battery death: Aug 16, 2008.
	* Energizer Lithium mysteriously stopped working March 11, 2008. Maybe some devices don't like them? Not sure why it ~~works~~ so well the first time.		* Energizer Lithium mysteriously stopped working March 11, 2008. Maybe some devices don't like them? Not sure why it worked so well the first time.

	== Conclusion ==		== Conclusion ==

	Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). This is assuming you don't run into odd issues.		Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). This is assuming you don't run into odd issues.

Denis at 02:18, 12 March 2008

2008-03-12T02:18:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 12 March 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:

	* Energizer Lithium, installed Feb 29, 2008, '''estimated''' battery death: Aug 16, 2008.		* Energizer Lithium, installed Feb 29, 2008, '''estimated''' battery death: Aug 16, 2008.
			* Energizer Lithium mysteriously stopped working March 11, 2008. Maybe some devices don't like them? Not sure why it works so well the first time.

	== Conclusion ==		== Conclusion ==

	Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). We'~~ll see what round two reveals~~.		Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). This is assuming you don't run into odd issues.

Denis: /* Second Trial */

2008-03-01T03:24:27Z

Second Trial

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:24, 1 March 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Second Trial ==		== Second Trial ==

	* Energizer Lithium, installed Feb 29, 2008		* Energizer Lithium, installed Feb 29, 2008, '''estimated''' battery death: Aug 16, 2008.

	== Conclusion ==		== Conclusion ==

	Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). We'll see what round two reveals.		Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). We'll see what round two reveals.

Denis at 03:18, 1 March 2008

2008-03-01T03:18:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 1 March 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	* Energizer Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, died on May 30th 2007 (169 days!)		* Energizer Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, died on May 30th 2007 (169 days!)
	* ~~Regular~~ Energizer, installed May 30th 2007, died Aug 30th 2007 (61 days)		* Energizer Alkaline, installed May 30th 2007, died Aug 30th 2007 (61 days)

	== Second Trial ==		== Second Trial ==

Denis at 03:16, 1 March 2008

2008-03-01T03:16:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:16, 1 March 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:		Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:

	== Trial 1 ==		== First Trial ==

	* Energizer Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, died on May 30th 2007 (169 days!)		* Energizer Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, died on May 30th 2007 (169 days!)
	* Regular Energizer, installed May 30th 2007, died Aug 30th 2007 (61 days)		* Regular Energizer, installed May 30th 2007, died Aug 30th 2007 (61 days)

	== Trial 2 ==		== Second Trial ==

	* Energizer Lithium, installed Feb 29, 2008		* Energizer Lithium, installed Feb 29, 2008

Denis at 03:14, 1 March 2008

2008-03-01T03:14:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 1 March 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:		Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:

	* ~~Energy~~ Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, died on May 30th 2007 (169 days!)		== Trial 1 ==

			* Energizer Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, died on May 30th 2007 (169 days!)
	* Regular Energizer, installed May 30th 2007, died Aug 30th 2007 (61 days)		* Regular Energizer, installed May 30th 2007, died Aug 30th 2007 (61 days)

	Conclusion: Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). ~~As time permits I will have to repeat the experiment and~~ see ~~if I get the same result~~.		== Trial 2 ==

			* Energizer Lithium, installed Feb 29, 2008

			== Conclusion ==

			Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). We'll see what round two reveals.

Denis: New page: Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below: * Energy Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, di...

2008-02-27T18:56:34Z

New page: Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below: * Energy Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, di...

New page

Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:

* Energy Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, died on May 30th 2007 (169 days!)
* Regular Energizer, installed May 30th 2007, died Aug 30th 2007 (61 days)

Conclusion: Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). As time permits I will have to repeat the experiment and see if I get the same result.