Battery Test: Difference between revisions

From The Incoherency.Net Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Denis (talk | contribs)
New page: Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below: * Energy Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, di...
 
Denis (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:
Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:


* Energy Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, died on May 30th 2007 (169 days!)
== Trial 1 ==
 
* Energizer Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, died on May 30th 2007 (169 days!)
* Regular Energizer, installed May 30th 2007, died Aug 30th 2007 (61 days)
* Regular Energizer, installed May 30th 2007, died Aug 30th 2007 (61 days)


Conclusion: Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). As time permits I will have to repeat the experiment and see if I get the same result.
== Trial 2 ==
 
* Energizer Lithium, installed Feb 29, 2008
 
== Conclusion ==
 
Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). We'll see what round two reveals.

Revision as of 03:14, 1 March 2008

Using a Logitech MX-610 wireless mouse I decided to test whether or not the new Energizer Lithium batteries are worthwhile. The results below:

Trial 1

  • Energizer Lithium, installed Dec 12, 2006, died on May 30th 2007 (169 days!)
  • Regular Energizer, installed May 30th 2007, died Aug 30th 2007 (61 days)

Trial 2

  • Energizer Lithium, installed Feb 29, 2008

Conclusion

Based on a single test it would appear the Lithium batteries last nearly 3 times as long (2.77 to be precise). We'll see what round two reveals.